Does Malibu Media, L.L.C. win the title “Biggest Filer of Lawsuits?”


Malibu Media, LLC (“Malibu”) has over 1894 lawsuits filed against BitTorrent pirates since March 2014. They started filing suits in 2012 when they noticed their subscriber numbers decreased significantly.


Malibu has been shooting adult films in the United States, Europe, South America since 2009. Their website is Malibu offers subscribers a monthly subscription for unlimited access to their short films. Business was very profitable until in 2011, the number of subscribers decreased. Malibu hired investigators to find out the reason.

The investigation showed people were watching the pirated version of their short films. Subsequently, Malibu hired investigators to get physical addresses connected to Internet Protocols (“I.P.”) addresses where the films were shared through BitTorrent; their attorneys would use court discovery to link the defendants to the addresses. Generally, the Internet Service Provider assigns I.P. addresses to individuals. When a BitTorrent user downloads movies, the user’s I.P. address is shown.


However, there are problems with identifying defendants through I.P. addresses. Neighbors of the I.P. addresses can hack using the address or roommates sharing the same wireless networks could increase the chances of selecting inaccurate infringers.

In 2013, Malibu issued summons to the copyright infringers for the pirated films. Malibu increased their movie production while increasing their copyright-infringement lawsuits. In 2014, Malibu averaged more than three filed suits a day. Malibu has multiple default victories where the alleged infringer, who cannot defend himself, was a pro se defendant, or settled.

Does this earn Malibu the title copyright troll?

The latest case involves the alleged infringer identified to be a student: Malibu Media v. Roberto Roldan. The I.P. address does not match the student’s physical address nor is the student the holder of that account. The defendant’s attorney filed the answer to Malibu Media’s complaint in January 19, 2015. See:

Generally, a plaintiff is required to present evidence that the entire work or a substantial part of it was shared, to prove infringement. However, after the complaint, Malibu dismissed Roberto as the alleged infringer and moved to substitute Roberto’s father as the defendant. On February 26, 2015, the judge ruled to allow Roberto’s father as a defendant.

The court decides whether Malibu Media wins or not on March 2, 2015. What and how do you think the court will decide? Is Malibu trying to make money through these lawsuits? Or, is it trying to deter piracy? Would this article give you a more predictable answer?

3 thoughts on “Does Malibu Media, L.L.C. win the title “Biggest Filer of Lawsuits?”

  1. Nice post. I used to be checking constantly this blog and I’m
    impressed! Extremely useful info particularly
    the last section 🙂 I take care of such info much.
    I was seeking this particular info for a long time. Thank you and good luck.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s